Inevitable Sugar Fallacy's
This is from investigation point of view............
Much have have been said about the 'illegal' impotention of sugar into the country but My Organic Chemistry used to tell me that Mercury can only exist in Ethyl Mercury form after binding to some protein material in some animals, mostly fish. Mercury cannot be mixed with organic matter, in this case sugar.
If you pour mercury in sugar, it will not bind to sugar granules but settle at the bottom. Then, who can buy tons of mercury to pour in sacks of sugar? Yet, even as you finish your tea, the gobbles of mercury will be clearly visible at the bottom. In fact you eat more mercury in fish as Ethyl Mercury than from any other sources.
Lead does not bind with organic compounds, and if anyone grinds lead and pours it in sugar, the blackish colour will be noticed easily as it reacts with oxygen.
Copper oxide does not dissolve in water or any organic matter, so it can't mix with sugar.
Now who did the analysis of the "contaminated sugar?"
"I'm doing some little maths here. Pure mercury goes for $48 (4800/- per 100g. Sugar goes for 0.1 shillings per gram. Who is that stupid enough to waste mercury on sugar?"
Who is f**ling who..? From investigation point of view I can tell you that this is a business rivalry cartel fighting cartel...Enjoy your sugar
Comments
Post a Comment